Thread View: misc.consumers.frugal-living
23 messages
23 total messages
Started by Daniel Woodard
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:18
Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: Daniel Woodard
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:18
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 21:18
16 lines
625 bytes
625 bytes
My wife and I are thinking of using some of our tax refund to buy a new stereo. I don't want to spend more than $150 max. There are a couple of "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, which we can just barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. (no digital tuner, and no external antenna hookup) One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see if we can pull in these stations better. Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since 1995, and then it was just a cheapie. Thanks, Slugbug
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "Don K"
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:45
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2004 23:45
30 lines
1565 bytes
1565 bytes
"Daniel Woodard" <fuzzhead72@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4085cbdd_1@athena.netset.com... > My wife and I are thinking of using some of our tax refund to buy a new > stereo. I don't want to spend more than $150 max. There are a couple of > "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, which we can just > barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. (no digital tuner, and > no external antenna hookup) One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. > I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see > if we can pull in these stations better. > > Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since > 1995, and then it was just a cheapie. Do a reality check before you buy anything. Car radios are usually pretty good. If your car radio is just barely receiving the stations, whatever else you buy will not do much better, except for the external antenna. If your car has an external antenna, attach a long wire to it to get an idea of how much you can improve the reception. Or alternatively, drive to a nearby hill and check for better reception. If you can't improve it, then you might as well forget about picking up those oldie stations. Another trick is to switch off the stereo button. That will improve the signal to noise by nearly a factor of 10. A digital tuner is great for setting the frequency, but it doesn't mean it will receive weak stations any better than your cheap radio. The qualities of a good receiver are low noise, good filtering, and immunity to signal overload. Don
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: sambalover@aol.c
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:45
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:45
13 lines
380 bytes
380 bytes
Check out pawn shops, and look for Boze Wave systems. Excellent quality, superior sound, and I've bought two for $100 and under. You don't have to have a huge system to get good sound. Bev Remove the "SpamFree" for email, please. Join us in the Diabetic-Talk Chatroom on UnderNet /server irc.undernet.org --- /join #Diabetic-Talk More info: http://www.diabetic-talk.org/
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "Nonymous"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:07
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 10:07
18 lines
843 bytes
843 bytes
"Daniel Woodard" <fuzzhead72@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:4085cbdd_1@athena.netset.com... > My wife and I are thinking of using some of our tax refund to buy a new > stereo. I don't want to spend more than $150 max. There are a couple of > "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, which we can just > barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. (no digital tuner, and > no external antenna hookup) One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. > I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see > if we can pull in these stations better. > > Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since > 1995, and then it was just a cheapie. The smaller mid-size / mini-systems by Aiwa, etc. have quite impressive sound. They're much more than just 'boom boxes for a shelf'.
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: Justin
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:24
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:24
20 lines
820 bytes
820 bytes
"Chloe" <justsayno@spam.com> wrote in news:Czwhc.48136$B%4.24148@fe2.columbus.rr.com: > there's quite an element of personal taste involved in what > constitutes good sound. No substitute for trying different things out > till you find what you like best. I think my $20 Altec Lansing speakers sound wonderful hooked to our PC. I have most of my CD collection converted to Windows Media Files on our PC and just pick one and put it on shuffle play. Jazz, classical, rock all sound good. There's an EQ for adjustments. I've listened to Ozzy Osbourne cranked up REAL loud and the speakers still haven't popped. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: Justin
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:30
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:30
23 lines
987 bytes
987 bytes
> It does seem significant that the poster is suggesting that you can > find plenty of these at pawn shops, at a significantly lower price > than when bought new. To me, that suggests people get caught up > in the hype, and then sell them off when they don't meet the > expectations. > > Michael Most people who sell stuff to pawn shops are probably merely desperate for money, not unhappy with their stuff. Most pawn shops only take nice, quality stuff -- like stereos, musical instruments, tools, jewelry, etc.. No Foreman Grilles or toaster ovens or $5 Conair shower radios. :-) Then you have your thieves who steal stuff like Bose Wave radios and sell 'em to pawn shops. That's why it's important to write down serial numbers of your high end stuff, so it can be traced. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: cj.green@worldne
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:41
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:41
18 lines
929 bytes
929 bytes
Daniel Woodard <fuzzhead72@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<4085cbdd_1@athena.netset.com>... > My wife and I are thinking of using some of our tax refund to buy a new > stereo. I don't want to spend more than $150 max. There are a couple of > "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, which we can just > barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. (no digital tuner, and > no external antenna hookup) One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. > I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see > if we can pull in these stations better. > > Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since > 1995, and then it was just a cheapie. Sony tuners generally have better fringe FM reception than other makes (there may be other reasons to dislike Sony gear, but pulling in distant FM stations isn't one of them); you could look at those first. -- Chris Green
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: <tock@sbcglobal.
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:38
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:38
16 lines
399 bytes
399 bytes
"Bev" <sambalover@aol.comSpamFree> wrote in message news:20040420224513.23183.00000062@mb-m24.aol.com... > Check out pawn shops, and look for Boze Wave systems. Excellent quality, > superior sound, and I've bought two for $100 and under. > > You don't have to have a huge system to get good sound. > > Bev Huh . . . are the Bose systems really that much better than similar size radios? -Tock
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: ron@shell.core.c
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:52
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 13:52
16 lines
796 bytes
796 bytes
Daniel Woodard <fuzzhead72@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<4085cbdd_1@athena.netset.com>... > My wife and I are thinking of using some of our tax refund to buy a new > stereo. I don't want to spend more than $150 max. There are a couple of > "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, which we can just > barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. (no digital tuner, and > no external antenna hookup) One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. > I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see > if we can pull in these stations better. > Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since > 1995, and then it was just a cheapie. Turn your computer into a sound system. You can play CDs through your computer. -- Ron
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: Max
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:14
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 14:14
9 lines
190 bytes
190 bytes
Maybe a built-in would be better -- takes up less living space. <http://www.royaldevice.com/custom3.htm> .max -- the part of <betatron@earthlink.net> was played by maxwell monningh 8-p
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: et472@FreeNet.Ca
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:24
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:24
26 lines
857 bytes
857 bytes
(tock@sbcglobal.net) writes: > "Bev" <sambalover@aol.comSpamFree> wrote in message > news:20040420224513.23183.00000062@mb-m24.aol.com... >> Check out pawn shops, and look for Boze Wave systems. Excellent quality, >> superior sound, and I've bought two for $100 and under. >> >> You don't have to have a huge system to get good sound. >> >> Bev > > > Huh . . . are the Bose systems really that much better than similar size > radios? > -Tock > > Now that you bring it up, they have a notoriety for being overpriced and not delivering what the price would imply. It does seem significant that the poster is suggesting that you can find plenty of these at pawn shops, at a significantly lower price than when bought new. To me, that suggests people get caught up in the hype, and then sell them off when they don't meet the expectations. Michael
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "Chloe"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:38
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 15:38
35 lines
1451 bytes
1451 bytes
<tock@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message news:aPuhc.297$lg1.214@newssvr23.news.prodigy.com... > > "Bev" <sambalover@aol.comSpamFree> wrote in message > news:20040420224513.23183.00000062@mb-m24.aol.com... > > Check out pawn shops, and look for Boze Wave systems. Excellent quality, > > superior sound, and I've bought two for $100 and under. > > > > You don't have to have a huge system to get good sound. > > > > Bev > > > Huh . . . are the Bose systems really that much better than similar size > radios? > -Tock I've noticed on Usenet that before saying anything positive about Bose it's a good idea to swathe yourself in Kevlar. Their stuff if bought new is probably overpriced due to all the advertising they do, some people don't like the characteristic "Bose sound," and there seem to be plenty of others whose dislike of Bose is just generic or a status/snob notion. I have a Bose Wave in the bedroom. I really like the sound and the compactness of the unit. I listen mostly to classical music at modest volume and I feel like it does a good job for what I use it for. I asked for it as a Christmas gift a few years ago. I sure wish I'd had the sense to check pawn shops, though. At $100 I think anyone except the most rabid Bose basher would consider it a decent deal. OTOH, there's quite an element of personal taste involved in what constitutes good sound. No substitute for trying different things out till you find what you like best.
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: bicycle@charter.
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:29
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:29
20 lines
980 bytes
980 bytes
Daniel Woodard <fuzzhead72@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:<4085cbdd_1@athena.netset.com>... > My wife and I are thinking of using some of our tax refund to buy a new > stereo. I don't want to spend more than $150 max. There are a couple of > "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, which we can just > barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. (no digital tuner, and > no external antenna hookup) One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. > I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see > if we can pull in these stations better. > > Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since > 1995, and then it was just a cheapie. Not a stereo, but the GE Super Radio is pretty good at pulling in stations. Has good sound too. Here's an original Super Radio on ebay <http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&category051&item091456805&rd=1> The new Super Radio III can be had there for $39.99.
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: Richard Dreyfuss
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:44
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 18:44
24 lines
1128 bytes
1128 bytes
"Chloe" <justsayno@spam.com> wrote in news:Czwhc.48136$B%4.24148@fe2.columbus.rr.com: > I have a Bose Wave in the bedroom. I really like the sound and the > compactness of the unit. I listen mostly to classical music at modest > volume and I feel like it does a good job for what I use it for. I > asked for it as a Christmas gift a few years ago. I sure wish I'd had > the sense to check pawn shops, though. At $100 I think anyone except > the most rabid Bose basher would consider it a decent deal. OTOH, > there's quite an element of personal taste involved in what > constitutes good sound. No substitute for trying different things out > till you find what you like best. I saw a live demo of the bose wave radio years ago when they first came out. The bass didn't sound as clear when it was turned up loud, but at moderate volumes it did sound like a bigger stereo with a good low end (all I really cared about then). I don't remember what they were asking for it, but it was something quite absurd though. If space and design are a consideration, a reasonably priced one would definately be an option. Ben
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "Don K"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:07
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:07
18 lines
664 bytes
664 bytes
"Chloe" <justsayno@spam.com> wrote in message news:suDhc.50748$B%4.17455@fe2.columbus.rr.com... > > Yep, this is getting off the topic but when I can sit in one place and > listen, what I really like is the sound from my plain little old Sony > Walkman which I use with a good quality set of headphones. Headphones have their place when you don't want to disturb other people, but having them on my head for any length of time gives me the willies and I just want to tear them off because they get so uncomfortable and hot. I'd much rather crank up the volume using a pair of 200 Watt amplifiers driving a good speaker system than put up with headphones. Don
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: me6@privacy.net
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:21
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 20:21
10 lines
379 bytes
379 bytes
>I think my $20 Altec Lansing speakers sound wonderful hooked to our PC. I >have most of my CD collection converted to Windows Media Files on our PC >and just pick one and put it on shuffle play That's what I do.... use my PC as a "stereo" If I was gonna buy a dedicated stereo.... Id get a boombox that plays MP3 files. Like this one....see link http://tinyurl.com/2kb8g
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "Chloe"
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 23:30
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 23:30
23 lines
951 bytes
951 bytes
"Justin" <justin1138@REMOVEnet> wrote in message news:Xns94D27F48EC1Ajustin1138REMOVEzoom@209.25.157.130... > "Chloe" <justsayno@spam.com> wrote in > news:Czwhc.48136$B%4.24148@fe2.columbus.rr.com: > > there's quite an element of personal taste involved in what > > constitutes good sound. No substitute for trying different things out > > till you find what you like best. > > > > I think my $20 Altec Lansing speakers sound wonderful hooked to our PC. I > have most of my CD collection converted to Windows Media Files on our PC > and just pick one and put it on shuffle play. Jazz, classical, rock all > sound good. There's an EQ for adjustments. I've listened to Ozzy Osbourne > cranked up REAL loud and the speakers still haven't popped. Yep, this is getting off the topic but when I can sit in one place and listen, what I really like is the sound from my plain little old Sony Walkman which I use with a good quality set of headphones.
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: jeffm_@email.com
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:37
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 00:37
21 lines
961 bytes
961 bytes
>There are a couple of "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, >which we can just barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. >(no digital tuner, and no external antenna hookup) >One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. >I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, >to see if we can pull in these stations better. > Daniel Woodard (Slugbug) I see tuners (no amp) in thrift shops all the time for $10...$20. If you have inputs (RCA jacks) on your current stereo, that could be a frugal deal (or ebay). A pair of rabbit ears (300 ohm) from the 99 Cent store might be all the antenna you need. (TV channel 6 audio is ~88MHz; FM is 88...108MHz.) For a couple of bucks, you can buy a folded dipole that you can tape/thumbtack to your wall...or make your own http://216.239.53.104/search?qΓche:w8MftAgLnmgJ:www.kgnu.org/howtohear/antenna.html+antenna+made-*-300-*-lead-in http://www.kgnu.org/howtohear/antenna.html
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "JB"
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:50
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 02:50
16 lines
391 bytes
391 bytes
> Yep, this is getting off the topic but when I can sit in one place and > listen, what I really like is the sound from my plain little old Sony > Walkman which I use with a good quality set of headphones.< I don't like headphones so I connected my Walkman to quality speakers through the computer's sound card and it's great. This way I can record programs for later as well. > > >
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "Chloe"
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:34
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 11:34
21 lines
837 bytes
837 bytes
"Don K" <dk@dont_bother_me.com> wrote in message news:oZCdnX7tB_BOkRrdRVn-ug@comcast.com... > "Chloe" <justsayno@spam.com> wrote in message news:suDhc.50748$B%4.17455@fe2.columbus.rr.com... > > > > Yep, this is getting off the topic but when I can sit in one place and > > listen, what I really like is the sound from my plain little old Sony > > Walkman which I use with a good quality set of headphones. > > Headphones have their place when you don't want to disturb other > people, but having them on my head for any length of time gives > me the willies and I just want to tear them off because they > get so uncomfortable and hot. > > I'd much rather crank up the volume using a pair of 200 Watt > amplifiers driving a good speaker system than put up with > headphones. FWIW, I don't use them for volume, I use them for clarity.
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: "Don K"
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:41
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:41
28 lines
1126 bytes
1126 bytes
"Chloe" <justsayno@spam.com> wrote in message news:c5Ohc.51053$B%4.29491@fe2.columbus.rr.com... > "Don K" <dk@dont_bother_me.com> wrote in message > news:oZCdnX7tB_BOkRrdRVn-ug@comcast.com... > > "Chloe" <justsayno@spam.com> wrote in message > news:suDhc.50748$B%4.17455@fe2.columbus.rr.com... > > > > > > Yep, this is getting off the topic but when I can sit in one place and > > > listen, what I really like is the sound from my plain little old Sony > > > Walkman which I use with a good quality set of headphones. > > > > Headphones have their place when you don't want to disturb other > > people, but having them on my head for any length of time gives > > me the willies and I just want to tear them off because they > > get so uncomfortable and hot. > > > > I'd much rather crank up the volume using a pair of 200 Watt > > amplifiers driving a good speaker system than put up with > > headphones. > > FWIW, I don't use them for volume, I use them for clarity. Me too. But when you're driving big speakers, you need to have enough power to run them at what is the natural level of the sound you are recreating. Don
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: dada
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 03:32
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 03:32
25 lines
884 bytes
884 bytes
Daniel Woodard wrote: > My wife and I are thinking of using some of our tax refund to buy a new > stereo. I don't want to spend more than $150 max. There are a couple of > "oldies" stations which play 1950's and 1960's music, which we can just > barely get in the car, but not on our cheap stereo. (no digital tuner, and > no external antenna hookup) One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. > I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see > if we can pull in these stations better. > > Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since > 1995, and then it was just a cheapie. > > Thanks, > > Slugbug check out www.live365.com it has some annoying popups, but lots of oldies (as well as other types). Hope this helps
Re: Suggestions for good but cheap stereo?
Author: Derald
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:49
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 13:49
21 lines
921 bytes
921 bytes
Daniel Woodard <fuzzhead72@yahoo.com> wrote: >One of these stations is AM, and one is FM. >I would like to be able to hook up an external FM and AM antenna, to see >if we can pull in these stations better. Except in very strong signal areas, all save maybe the very best tuner/receivers perform better with properly-dimensioned "external" antennas. > > Do any of you have suggestions? I have not purchased a stereo since >1995, and then it was just a cheapie. Thrift store; yard/garage/estate sale; Salvation Army store; Goodwill store; odd-lots or closeouts dealer/liquidator (some good ones on WWW); church rummage sales. If looking for specifics, then, knowledge and patience are primary virtues. IME, for a number of reasons, pawn shops rarely are good places to shop and cannot begin to compare with these other choices in price or value, even with SA's and Goodwill's inflated prices nowadays. -- HTH, Derald
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads