Thread View: rec.games.bridge
6 messages
6 total messages
Started by "Div"
Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:44
Four possibilities?
Author: "Div"
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:44
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 10:44
11 lines
103 bytes
103 bytes
MP-SAYC agreed system Both Sides Vulnerable Sitting South (North deals) 9853 A85 KQ872 6 1C-(1S)-??
Re: Four possibilities?
Author: "Phil"
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:37
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 11:37
16 lines
207 bytes
207 bytes
Bob Lipton wrote: > Div wrote: > > MP-SAYC agreed system > > Both Sides Vulnerable > > Sitting South (North deals) > > > > 9853 > > A85 > > KQ872 > > 6 > > > > 1C-(1S)-?? 2D. These are all great cards.
Re: Four possibilities?
Author: "Sandy E. Barnes
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:08
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:08
21 lines
329 bytes
329 bytes
"Div" <sps1726@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1134067479.524843.278360@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > MP-SAYC agreed system > Both Sides Vulnerable > Sitting South (North deals) > > 9853 > A85 > KQ872 > 6 > > 1C-(1S)-?? 2D, if this is not a game force. Otherwise Pass and wait for partner's action. Sandy Barnes
Re: Four possibilities?
Author: "raija d"
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:59
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:59
20 lines
443 bytes
443 bytes
"Div" <sps1726@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:1134067479.524843.278360@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com... > MP-SAYC agreed system > Both Sides Vulnerable > Sitting South (North deals) > > 9853 > A85 > KQ872 > 6 > > 1C-(1S)-?? I am curious as to what four possibilities. Pass is fine, 2D is fine. I would 2D if playing SAYC even if I don't have the mandated 10HCP but this is worth the equivalent. Anything else seems way bad to me.
Re: Four possibilities?
Author: Bob Lipton
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:19
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:19
18 lines
150 bytes
150 bytes
Div wrote: > MP-SAYC agreed system > Both Sides Vulnerable > Sitting South (North deals) > > 9853 > A85 > KQ872 > 6 > > 1C-(1S)-?? > Pass. Bob
Re: Four possibilities?
Author: "Thomas Dehn"
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:00
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 22:00
23 lines
386 bytes
386 bytes
"Div" <sps1726@hotmail.com> wrote: > MP-SAYC agreed system > Both Sides Vulnerable > Sitting South (North deals) > > 9853 > A85 > KQ872 > 6 > > 1C-(1S)-?? I pass. I have spade length, thus opener can be expected to reopen. With the misfit for partner's clubs, this hand is not worth a 2D bid. Double with 3-1 in the rounded suits has little appeal, and 1NT is even worse. Thomas
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads