Article View: rec.motorcycles.harley
Article #99359Re: ? 'bout kit bikes - pros & cons...and free drinks.
From: 57panhead
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:29
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 16:29
67 lines
2862 bytes
2862 bytes
On 11 Apr 2004 18:40:13 -0700, andythe@earthlink.net (big stinkie) uttered something about: >1. Why would you avoid buying a kit bike? If you don't mind, be >specific. "No resale value." "I can't wrench worth a damn." "The >parts never fit." You get the idea. > >2. Why would you want to build a kit bike? "Pride of doing it >myself." "Got something that looks different than most other bikes." >"My son and I can do it as a project together." Andy, I'm relatively new here so I don't often have much to contribute - more of a lurker and learner. Before I bought "Mo" last summer I considered building a kit and asked the same questions of myself that you are posing to the group. "Why would I want to build a kit bike?" 1. I thought it would be cheaper than a new bike. 2. I thought the kit would have parts that would bolt together without having to do a lot of research because I had *very* limited knowledge of bike construction (OK - NO knowledge). 3. I thought it would be tremendously satisfying to ride something that I had built myself. "Why would I not want to build a kit bike?" 1. When I would look at the used Harley sites on the web I would not even give a second look to anything that said "custom". So, if I wasn't willing to consider buying something that someone else put together what chance would I have of ever selling a bike that I built when the time came? 2. When I really started adding things up it was not really much cheaper than a fairly new used Harley. So, what I did was I bought an old Harley that needed lots of work. This basically gave me all the perceived advantages of the kit bike without the disadvantages: 1. Even after sticking a ton of money into a frame-up rebuilt my total cost will still be less than a lot of kits. 2. I did not have to research every component for fit and compatibility - although all the things that were missing or needed replacing on the bike still required *LOTS* of research. 3. Doing a frame-up rebuild gives me the satisfaction of riding something that I built myself, and I will know *every*thing about that bike when I'm done. 4. It's a genuine H-D. When I'm ready to sell it there will be someone willing to buy it and being a '57 Pan with a certain amount of nostalgia should make it fairly easy to sell. (Not that I bought this bike as an "investment", but someday I'll quit riding - when I can't kick it anymore.) But, seems to me that the crowd here at the VB&G is already pretty solidly in the anti-kit-bike camp. What you need to do is find a group that has already gone the kit-bike route and find out what they liked and didn't like about the kit they built, then capitalize on that to differentiate your product. FWIW there you have my rambling thoughts on kit bikes. Thanks for the iced cappuccino. Regards, 57panhead '57 FLH "Mo" http://57panhead.com
Message-ID:
<na7r70det71eek13cuokcjc0hmqh5piivo@4ax.com>
Path:
novabbs.pugleaf.net!archive.newsdeef.eu!mbox2nntp-rec.motorcycles.harley.20140725.mbox.gz!number1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!internal1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!kapus.hminternetconnection.COM!not-for-mail
References:
<2e492522.0404111740.396d0abd@posting.google.com>