Article View: rec.outdoors.rv-travel
Article #99941Re: OT: Why hasn't Kerry been charged with treason?
From: Lone Haranguer
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:31
Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:31
17 lines
575 bytes
575 bytes
John Kinney wrote: > On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:43:38 -0700, Lone Haranguer wrote: > > >>The offense is covered under Federal Kerry's actions make a clear case >>for treason and there IS NO STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS FOR TREASON. > > > Probably for the same reason Bush hasn't been charged with sedition, > malfeasance, drug abuse and AWOL, hm? > > Regards, John Kinney > Just assemble your evidence and make a clear case, booby. The evidence against Kerry is public knowledge and well documented. Besides treason has no statute of limitations, your shopping list does. LZ
Message-ID:
<c1t459$1lurou$1@ID-192430.news.uni-berlin.de>Path:
novabbs.pugleaf.net!archive.newsdeef.eu!mbox2nntp-rec.outdoors.rv-travel.(866431).mbox.7z!not-for-mailReferences:
<c1ru71$1maf9j$1@ID-192430.news.uni-berlin.de> <pan.2004.02.29.14.23.47.91273@www.smoke-island.com>